Thursday, April 23, 2009

Chapter Nine

The Contour and Substance of Meaning

This chapter starts with an article from the New York Times by David Remick from January 29, 1996. It is, might I say, an article not in the least bit interesting to me or to the author except for the fact that she was considering using it as an introduction to a chapter in this particular book on synthesis. After discussion with her co-author, they decide to use it to make a point. She states that as she read this particular article she was synthesizing during and after reading it. However, due to her experienced reading ability the synthesis didn’t come without the result of other comprehension strategies that she used as she read. It was composed of a myriad of tiny mental pieces that formed a mosaic of understanding of the text.
She continues to say that she wasn’t summarizing the article in her mind, for summarizing would be highlights of the text: a listing of parts whereas synthesis is the creation of a whole. Synthesis is the process of ordering, recalling, retelling and recreating into a coherent whole the information with which our minds are bombarded every day. Synthesis is a uniquely human trait that permits us sift through a myriad of details and focus on those pieces we need to know and remember. Synthesis is about organizing the different pieces to create a mosaic; a meaning. This is a process that we all engage in naturally every day.
The author now realizes that synthesis is absolutely basic. We must reorganize and create our own explanations for what we are learning, our own definitions of our lives at any particular point in time.

Some Key Ideas
The process of synthesizing occurs during reading:

v Proficient readers maintain a cognitive synthesis as they read. They monitor the overall meaning, important concepts and themes in the text as they read and are aware of ways test elements fir together to create that overall meaning and theme. A proficient reader’s synthesis is likely to extend the literal meaning of a text to the inferential level.
v Proficient readers are aware of text elements and patterns in fiction and nonfiction and understand that being aware of them as they read helps them predict and understand the overall meanings or themes.
v As they read, proficient readers attend more directly to character, setting, conflict, sequence of event, resolution, the theme in fiction and to text patterns such as description, chronological, cause and effect, comparison/contrast and problem/solution in nonfiction. The use this knowledge to make decisions about the overall meaning of a passage, chapter, or book.
v Proficient readers actively revise their cognitive syntheses as they read. New information is assimilated into the reader’s evolving ideas about the text, rendering some earlier decisions about the text obsolete.

The process of synthesizing occurs after reading:
v Proficient readers are able to express through a variety of means, a synthesis of what they have read. The synthesis includes ideas and themes relevant to the overall meaning from the text and is cogently presents.
v Proficient readers use synthesis to share, recommend, and critically review books they have read.
v Proficient readers purposefully use synthesis to better understand what they have read. Syntheses are frequently an amalgam of all comprehensions strategies use by proficient readers.

Barbara Stala

7 comments:

  1. I think that synthesising is a tough concept for some of my young readers. When I teach them, I FEEL like they are synthesising, but I wonder how much they really are. The kids become experts as we learn, and they understand concepts and can apply them (usually), but weeks after we have moved on from a particular topic I often find that they have forgotten important "stuff." I feel like if it truly had been synthesized, they wouldn't have forgotten it. I don't expect them to remember every single thing we learn, but I am surprised when some of the major concepts and skills get lost over time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree with Lauren. I am shocked about the statement that the author made about synthesizing..."Synthesis is about organizing the different pieces to create a mosaic; a meaning. This is a process that we all engage in naturally every day."

    I think synthesizing is basic for average or above average readers, but not low level readers. Synthesizing is a very difficult skill for special ed. students. Their minds don't "naturally" organize text so that it makes sense. It's a laborious process for them that they need to actively engage in. That's why teachers should explicitly teach kids how to synthesize.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you Jamie. You and I have discussed this before, concerning how so many ideas that are brought up for teaching would work extremely well for average and above-average readers. However, when you work with struggling readers, so many of these things that should occur "naturally" just aren't there. And many times, even when they are explicitly taught, they are always retained. I will say that I really do enjoy chapters and sections that pertain especially to struggling readers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have to admit that it was just last school year when I learned there was a difference between summarizing and synthesizing - and I almost wish I hadn't learned the difference!

    Teaching synthesizing to struggling readers has almost taken this entire year (and we gave up on making connections for awhile - but that's another post!) Just understanding the concept of synthesizing took quite awhile and now we're working on applying it (with a lot of guidance.) Unfortunately, reading this chapter didn't help much with teaching my struggling readers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Barbara, this was a great post about synthesizing. It has clarified the meaning for me. I've never used the term with my students, mainly because I wasn't completely sure about it. The last chapter in "Reading with Meaning" is devoted to synthesizing and it includes anchor lessons and suggested literature. I hope to begin exploring this concept with my students soon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am in total agreement that one of the most difficult parts is the retention of material. It is very hard to synthesize information when there is very little left over to make connections with.

    This is also an area where I am very "green" and at times it seems like I'm learning with my students. Modeling and instruction of synthesis has had some success, but I'm hoping to improve in this area as time goes by. This chapter was enlightening to me also, but I think the opening article was NOT the best choice for Keene to use. I'm just saying...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought I knew what synthesizing was-but after reading this post I have to say that I had no idea how much it really encompasses. When I taught fifth grade there was a mini lesson occasionally thrown into the reading book about "synthesizing information" but it clearly only scratched the surface. Now that I have a better idea of what it actually is, I hope to begin introducing the concept with my students.

    ReplyDelete